If I were a feminist, I would feel reluctant to admit Herland as one of the fictional works that properly illustrate feminism. The perspective of feminism would be alarmingly narrowed down if it were nothing but female overthrowing the other gender. More pessimistically, this so-called Feminism Utopia is just constructed in the shadow of male-oriented domain.
Of course, the male figures are outrun in every aspect in the novel, but the stunning capabilities of prowess and agility that the Herlandians possess are what the male traditionally exhibit, showing that it is still the male qualities that hold sway, or at least get highlighted for a race to survive and prosper. More regrettably, by having the children raised only by experts, the woman is deprived of a merit that would normally characterize females [1]. Therefore, the whole setting is still based on the logic of male-domain world, with the opposite gender contorted, or idealized, to fit the prerequisites.
Also, I find it difficult to believe if not shaped by the view from male logic how can a dreamful world focus so fervently on utilitarianism: all less-favored beings(even butterflies [2]) are “breed-out”, birth rights(by parthenogenesis of course) are strictly put under control. Efficiency rules out sensibility. More significantly, such an impeccable land along with its social structure is presented by the narrative of a male, discovered and explored by the male. This Herland is literally a SIGHT through the gaze of male. It means that only through the eyesight of Male can the gender female be defined, even as a progressive version.
Another interesting part is the lack of any female counterpart in our world. Viewed as a complete universe, Herland only has less masculine male and superb female. Therefore, in this very sense, we may consider the novel as one attempting to smudge the boundary of sex. However, functioned as compensation, fantasy actually magnifies what the painful realities are in the outer, as well as inner, world of the writer.
[1] P 95
[2] P100
cited from Gilman, Charlotte Perkins, 1860-1935. Herland Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library
Beneath the Herland
对“Beneath the Herland”的回应
《她的国》热门书评
-
《她的国》译序
17有用 2无用 又又 2014-08-30
文/王骁双在译言古登堡计划推出女性文学专题时,有人大为不满,并评论「世界上有那么多重要的文学作品,能够开阔视野提升思想,为何译言偏要加大翻译女性文学,汉化没有营养、对社会没用的女权主义作品呢?」这样的话让我震惊,我才恍然意识到,身处这个现代化文明社会里这么久,跳出充斥学术理论的象牙塔,社会的现实却让...
-
她的国
7有用 0无用 锡兵在途中 2013-11-25
作为故事来看,本书相当沉闷,全部内容就是三名男性科学家探访孤雌生殖的隐秘国家,没有战争、没有灾难,除了文化差异,没有任何需要克服的困难。但是,如果把它作为女性(女权主义)视角的乌托邦设计文档来审视,则大不一样。首先,三个科学家的职业就很有寓意。Terry是探险活动的金主和机械师,一个传统意义上的男性...
-
Beneath the Herland
3有用 1无用 发福的唐吉珂徳 2013-03-21
If I were a feminist, I would feel reluctant to admit Herland as one of the fictional works that properly illustrate feminism. The perspective of femi...
-
她乡,女性乌托邦
3有用 0无用 乱看书 2012-05-16
作为女性乌托邦作品,作者吉尔曼女士在《她乡》中对男权社会进行了讽刺,叙写了一个女子社会中的神奇,的确给人一种耳目一新的感觉。在《黄色壁纸》中,以一个忧郁病人的视角叙写了由忧郁到疯狂的过程,同样是对男性的一种控诉。然而,这本书的翻译的确不尽人意,用语含混不清,许多句子令人莫名所以,大概只有译者自己懂得...