作者又是一个智能设计论者:美国dicovery研究所的早期成员,还认为地球非常年轻,就读于费城圣经大学......
这种伪科学著作,也只有神创论者会捧其臭脚
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Pearcey
Nancy Pearcey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nancy Randolph Pearcey (born 1952) is an American author who is a prominent intelligent design proponent, a Christian activist, and formerly the Francis A. Schaeffer Scholar at the World Journalism Institute.
Contents [hide]
1 Career
2 Intelligent design
3 Bibliography
4 References
5 External links
[edit] Career
Pearcey is editor-at-large of The Pearcey Report.
In September 2007, Pearcey was named Scholar for Worldview Studies at the Center for University Studies at Philadelphia Biblical University, Langhorne, Pennsylvania.[1]
[edit] Intelligent design
Pearcey is a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, the center of the intelligent design movement. Pearcey has played a role in a number of controversies surrounding the institute's campaign to challenge and ultimately unseat the teaching of evolution. Although Pearcey is now an intelligent design advocate, she was previously a young-earth creationist.[2][3]
As a contributing editor for the young-earth creationist Bible-Science Newsletter from 1977-1991 Pearcey often wrote monthly articles. As a free-lance writer she also drafted an Overview chapter for the controversial pro-intelligent design schoolbook Of Pandas and People. She then adapted material from that chapter for three articles in the Bible-Science Newsletter. In the course of the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial it was shown in testimony by Barbara Forrest that the draft Overview chapter of Of Pandas and People was subsequently edited to show the same changes from "creation/creationist" to "intelligent design/design proponent" that the six "excursion" chapters Of Pandas and People show. The substitution of patently creationist language in favor of putatively neutral intelligent design language in Of Pandas and People figured significantly in the judge's ruling that intelligent design is religious in nature and not actual science.[4]
Pearcey contributed the foreword to The Right Questions, as well as chapters in Mere Creation, Pro-Life Feminism, Genetic Ethics, Signs of Intelligence, Reading God's World, Uncommon Dissent, and a Phillip E. Johnson Festschrift titled "Darwin's Nemesis". Pearcey has served as a visiting scholar at Biola University's Torrey Honors Institute, an editorial board member for the evangelical Christian Salem Communications Network, and a commentator on Public Square Radio, a conservative Christian radio program. Her articles have appeared in numerous religious and politically conservative-leaning journals and magazines, including the Washington Times, Human Events, First Things, Books & Culture, World, Pro Rege, Human Life Review, The American Enterprise, The World & I, Homeschool Enrichment, Christianity Today, and the Regent University Law Review.[citation needed]
Pearcey is a frequent public lecturer and has appeared on NPR and C-SPAN.[citation needed]
[edit] Bibliography
Total Truth: Liberating Christianity from Its Cultural Captivity (Crossway, 2004; study guide edition 2005; winner of a Christianity Today Award of Merit and of the ECPA Gold Medallion Book Award [5]), foreword by Phillip E. Johnson
The Soul of Science: Christian Faith and Natural Philosophy (Crossway, 1994) ISBN 0-89107-766-9, coauthored by Charles B. Thaxton
How Now Shall We Live? (1999) ISBN 0-8423-1808-9, coauthored by Harold Fickett and Charles Colson.
With Charles Colson A Dance With Deception: Revealing the Truth Behind the Headlines ISBN 0-8499-3521-0
With Charles Colson A Dangerous Grace: Daily Readings
[edit] References
^ Author Dr. Nancy Pearcey Named Worldview Scholar at Philadelphia Biblical University's Center for University Studies ChristianNewsWire
^ Final ruling: Context Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
^ "Paul Nelson and John Mark Reynolds are well-known young earth creationists in both the CRSC and the ID movement in general, despite Dembski's public attempts to distance ID from them. And there are others: Percival Davis (co-author of Pandas), Nancy Pearcey, Ray Bohlin (his evasiveness notwithstanding), Charles Thaxton..." in Barbara Forrest and Paul R. Gross. Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Oxford University Press, 2004. page 275
^ Final ruling: Whether ID is science Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
^ 2005 Christian Book Awards Winners – Christianity and Society category
[edit] External links
The Pearcey Report (official website of news, comment, information, and worldview)
Pro-Existence (the weblog of Rick and Nancy Pearcey)
Total Truth The website for the book.
Nancey Pearcey from Discovery Institute
Nancey Pearcey from Access Research Network
Yet another version of the origins of ID Nick Matzke of National Center for Science Education critically reviews public statements by Pearcey against past writings, including her chapter in Of Pandas and People. The Panda's Thumb.
BreakPoint Commentary
World Journalism Institute official web site
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Pearcey"
另一个作者也是美国dicovery研究所的。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Thaxton
Charles Thaxton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Charles B. Thaxton is a Fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture. He has a doctorate in physical chemistry from Iowa State University. He went on to complete post-doctorate programs in the history of science at Harvard University and the molecular biology laboratories of Brandeis University. Thaxton has co-authored several books, including The Mystery of Life's Origin and The Soul of Science.[1] In The Mystery of Life's Origin, Thaxton argues for "Special Creation by a Creator beyond the Cosmos", and asserts that Special Creation holds "that the source that produced life was intelligent".[2]
He was the editor of the first edition of the controversial creationism/Intelligent Design textbook, Of Pandas and People.[1] The book was featured prominently in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District and the sequence of drafts that show the transition between the terms "creation" and "creator" to "design", "designer", and "intelligent design", proved important in the judge's decision.[3]
Thaxton was impressed by chemist and philosopher Michael Polanyi’s argument that the information in DNA could not be reduced to physics and chemistry. Something more was needed. Thaxton later said that he preferred intelligent design to creationism because he "wasn’t comfortable with the typical vocabulary that for the most part creationists were using because it didn’t express what I was trying to do. They were wanting to bring God into the discussion, and I was wanting to stay within the empirical domain and do what you can do legitimately there."[4]
[edit] Bibliography
Charles B. Thaxton, Walter L. Bradley, and Roger L. Olsen. The Mystery of Life's Origin: Reassessing Current Theories. (Philosophical Library, January 19, 1984) ISBN 0802224474 (Foreword by Dean H. Kenyon)
Charles Thaxton and Nancy Pearcey. The Soul of Science: Christian Faith and Natural Philosophy. (Crossway Books, Wheaton, Illinois 1994)
Charles Thaxton, Percival Davis, and Dean H. Kenyon. Of Pandas and People: The Central Question of Biological Origins (Foundation for Thought & Ethics, 1989, 1993)
[edit] References
^ a b Nick Matzke (2006-10-25). "9.0. Matzke (2006): The Story of the Pandas Drafts". National Center for Science Education. http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/9018_90__matzke_2006_the_story_10_3_2006.asp.
^ Barbara Forrest (April 1, 2007). "Expert Witness Report" (pdf). United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. http://www.creationismstrojanhorse.com/FORREST_EXPERT_REPORT.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-10-19.
^ Humes, Edward (2007). Monkey girl: evolution, education, religion, and the battle for America's soul. New York, N.Y: ECCO. p. 380. ISBN 0-06-088548-3. ; see judge's decision, pp 331-332
^ Thaxton, C. "Deposition of Dr. Charles Thaxton, 53:5–11" (Kitzmiller v. Dover Area Sch. Dist, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707, M.D. Pa., July 19, 2005).
[edit] External links
Bio of Charles Thaxton, Discovery Institute
Christianity and the Scientific Enterprise (I), an article dealing with the history of science
Online articles of Charles Thaxton, Discovery Institute
This biographical article about an American chemist is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Thaxton"
作者的简介
对“作者的简介”的回应
《科学的灵魂》热门书评
-
人类一思考,上帝就发笑?
12有用 3无用 睡虫 2010-12-04
(一)由来的史实缘于友人的推荐,也缘于对宗教的好奇,借此书了解坚定的基督教徒如何看待科学和科学的发展。前三分之一读得气馁。作者概述了对上帝的信仰如何使人相信自然是有秩序的可以理解的之后,将我们熟知的布鲁诺因支持科学而被教廷处以火刑归结为后世的误传,称他实际是被对异教的信仰所燃烧。这里有些有益的养分—...
-
平静使我的心在争论,争论使我的心得平静
8有用 3无用 EthanYuan 2009-01-11
这本书向我澄清了科学发展的来龙去脉,之所以是澄清,是因为整个历史远不像之前所了解的那么当然和纯粹。但是却很吻合人思想成长的经历,即便是科学家。读完后有一种回归真实的感受,可以很自由的呼吸,心中甚是舒畅。读书时对数学、物理和生物等理科科目留下的种种未能解释的怀疑都一一得到了它们存在的印证。只是很遗憾是...
-
科学的诞生
5有用 1无用 导爷 2010-09-02
资本主义近代社会以来的几百年来,人们都普遍认为科学就是简单追求真理,用人类的理性来解释世界,仿佛科学本身就是客观的真理,这也是现在大多数人的看法,而同时在人们的历史观点里面,大家普遍认为宗教与科学是势不两立的敌对势力。这种唯物主义的观点,一直以来使人们普遍认为在中世纪的历史上,现代科学的萌芽和发展都...
-
颠覆、重估还有重建
4有用 0无用 Grec 2007-01-08
如标题的三个关键词一样,这本书起码在我看来可以这样形容。一直在思考科学与哲学的关系,确切的说是哲学家在多大程度上使用了数学(广义上指科学,如天文学、物理学、生物学等)成果来构建他们的体系?这本书算是从另一个角度的解答。他研究了科学家的哲学基础和信仰背景,以及其研究成果对哲学和信仰上的影响。但绝对不是...
-
很好的科普读物
2有用 0无用 黑猫阿姨 2009-05-04
撇开信仰,这本书将500年来科学的来龙去脉做了很好的整理,将500年来的科学史分为3个不同的类型呈现在我们面前,包括许多著名的科学家、哲学家、数学家的介绍以及他们的生平。 关键是这本书让我们了解到:科学、哲...
书名: 科学的灵魂
作者:
出版社: 江西人民出版社
副标题: 500年科学与信仰、哲学的互动史
译者: 潘柏滔 | [美] 查理士·撒士顿
出版年: 2006.12
页数: 325
定价: 32.00元
装帧: 插图珍藏本
ISBN: 9787210034940

