The Essence of Business IV - Innovation
http://www.hwswworld.com/wp/?p=125
Today is the very last day of year 2006, time runs absurdly fast. A lot of things happened during the past year, something bad, something good, in China, in the US, in the world, in our company and outside our company. Overall 2006 is a good year for us, and I am expecting year 2007 would be a great year for us again
In the paper titled The Innovative Organization written by Peter Drucker, he defines how an organization should behave to be innovative, and he think being creative is not being innovative. The paper was written in 1982, more than two decades, is his view on innovative organization still valid in the new economy?
In my perspective, innovation is probably most important sweet spot that a business has to aim, strick and stick with. Innovation can be technical and business-wise. WalMart is definitely not a high-tech company, in whatever aspect, and WalMart was not the very first supermarket in the retail space, K-Mart and Sears (now they were merged togther) were well ahead of WalMart. What made WalMart stand out of a handful of strong competitors? Someone may contribute it to the great leadership of Sam Walton, and others may contribute it to the state-of-the-art satillite communication system deployed at WalMart in linking with all of its warehouses, chain stores, suppliers and the headquarter. The answer is its business innovation on best breed of supplier chain management that leads to it highly competitive pricing strategy. Similar sucess was achieved by Kinko (now FedEx Kinko), I hve an impression Kinko chain stores are very agressive on adopting new technolgies, and make those small businessmen’s daily practice easy. WalMart was, and still is a family business, Kinko was a partnership business, and there were no venture capital involed, yet they still achieved great success. Of course, I might give you more live examples similar to WalMat and Kinko, which are in traditional business. Now in high-tech business, Dell is an great example, its Direct Sales business model has made Dell to be one of the Fortune 500 without significant R & D spending. Business Innovation is the left arm of Innovation, now how about Technical Innovation, the right arm of Innovation?
Technical innovation demands serious innovation, but you does not need to be the first to excel. Let me give you some examples here: MicroSoft was not the first company who worked on PC based operating systems; Oracle was not the company invented Relational Database technology, which as made by IBM; and google’s co-founders approached yahoo! co-founders for funding, when their search enigine was still in its infancy, while yahoo! was listed as No. 1 web portal with a built-in search engine in the world. So being innovative today does not mean you shall hold your leadership position tommrrow, and pure technical innovation may not yield business success in most cases. Taking Apple as an example, Apple was one of the very first companies who rolled out PDAs outside its Mac related PC product lines, coded as Newton in early 1990s, and it failed. Comparing to the sucess of Palm Pilot, timing was a little bit early for Newton. iPod is another new gadget Apple rolled out recetly outside its Mac related PC product lines, and it is a huge success. Apple becomes the leader in innovation again, and it is a great combination of technical innovation and business innovation. Similar google’s unparallel success is largely due to its adavanced seach engine technology and its brand new online ads model (both adsense and adwords), again google was not the inventor of that new online ads model, which as made by a search engine company acquired by yahoo!. So be innovative in your business model, your technology, your business process, your markets, your ways of communication, and your ways of services, so on and so forth
Tommrrow is another day - sorry, Tommrrow is another year, we wish all the best, to you and your business!
The Essence of Business IV - Innovation
《撬动地球的Google》热门书评
-
Google的性格
108有用 9无用 keso 2006-10-26
在写《百度的性格》的时候,我说,强势的企业领导人,常常会让公司变成他自己的一个化身。这话对Google同样有效。Google的性格,就是两名创始人,尤其是 Sergey Brin的性格。Brin的喜好、理念和价值观,基本上就是Google的喜好、理念和价值观。CEO埃里克·施密特在被问到什么是“不作...
-
让上帝的归上帝 凯撒的归凯撒
44有用 4无用 [已注销] 2008-10-27
主耶酥曾经曰过:让上帝的归上帝,凯撒的归凯撒。 由于出生和所受教育的原因,我既不信上帝,也不排斥别人信上帝。可是,我依然心怀畏惧,对强大的自然规律、社会规律、经济规律、政治规律,我从来不想发起挑战。相反,我...
-
“不作恶”就是不让你作恶
7有用 5无用 煜 2008-06-20
我知道,到了今天,已经没几个人还会相信Google关于“不作恶(Do no evil)”的承诺,尽管他们曾经为此大声叫好。我知道,人们会举出大量的例子来证明他们的观点。 Google在IPO前开始允许公司使用其他公司登记注册的商标来做广告,它宣称自己做出这样的改变是为了更好地服务于用户,但...
-
到底是优秀的文化造就了Google优秀的产品,还是优秀的产品让这些所谓的Google文化变得臭屁哄哄
7有用 4无用 Kif 2007-03-01
花了一个月的马桶时间才把这本书看完。歌功颂德,溜须拍马的成分比较多。1.互联网光鲜亮丽的文化外表下包裹的依然是赤裸的商业竞争。2.一个互联网公司的成功从本质上是契合了一个时代的用户取向,而不是把两个创始人的所谓人格魅力吹到了天上。 3.到底是优秀的文化造就了Google优秀的产品,还是优秀的产品让...
-
The Google Story
6有用 1无用 LaoBai 2007-03-25
我在Blog上介绍过两本关于Google和搜索的书,第一本叫做《Google成功的七堂课》。我为这本书写了7篇Blog,其实已经不单纯是读后感了,而是借题发挥。上面的链接是最后一篇,每篇Blog结尾都有一个链接,正好指向上一篇,如果你有时间,回顾一下历史吧。 《七堂课》我并不推荐,虽然他是国内第一本...
书名: 撬动地球的Google
作者:
出版社: 中信出版社
译者: 张岩 | 马克·马西德
出版年: 2006-9
页数: 276
定价: 35.00元
装帧: 平装16开
ISBN: 9787508607092