這本書是Jack Qiu推薦的。在Moodle上有些討論,我很喜歡,轉帖在這裡。
From Daisy Lee:
This book was published in 1999, two years before 911. At that time, Mr. Friedman and other optimistic scholars had sufficient reasons to believe that the development of the Internet could be an impetus for commerce and communication between countries. But after 911, we can see through a serious of terrorist attacks that globalization is probably not a chance of promoting equality and two-way communication, but of helping the old and rising powers around the world compete for the "last virgin land" like Congo and Kenya.
Besides, the function of the Internet, as the backbone of global communication, might be overestimated. Indeed, the Internet has always been regarded as "the free market of ideas". But the actual situation is, even the communication mode on the Internet can hardly be viewed as "equal". Public figures can easily get lots of followers on Twitter and at the same time, what the ordinary people say is always been ignored. In this sense, does the Internet indeed bring a fairer communicating atmosphere?
From Jack Qiu:
Thanks, Daisy. Both of these points -- about 911 and the Internet -- are very good. Looking at the text from 1999, you can see how much global geopolitics have changed since 911 and how much public perceptions of the Internet have also changed in the past few years. Both these show, again, that globalization is not a "natural" or "predetermined" process. It is very dynamic, always responsive to human action regardless of the scale of action, large (as organized actions of terrorist groups) or small (as your personal conduct online).
Back to this book you're reading, I like it better than the "flat" book because it highlights the not-so-flat aspects of globalization as well. "The Olive Tree" is a most powerful metaphor to this end, to symbolize identities and traditions that resist forces of globalization. In that book, Friedman also paid more attention to "losers" of globalization and had some interesting discussion about the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997-1998. His more popular "flat" book is however much less sophisticated in treating these things from history to crises.
From Daisy Lee:
Thanks, Jack.
Friedman ever said that the more people stay in their Lexus, "the more they will want to spend time leaning against their olive trees". It seems incomprehensible, but the metaphor of "olive trees", just as you say, is indeed a symbol of identities and traditional cultures on which people living in the same "nation" (not "state", probably) could dependent when confronting the so-called "McDonaldization" around the world.
From Alice:
Dear Daisy,
Thank you for your Qs.
From my perspective, the internet provides us such a good platform for global communication. It is instant and effective(basically it is functional). However, since people establish a virtual world on the Internet, through chatting tools, BBS etc. begin communicate and fullfill dreams that they cannot realize in the real life. Although as you say that "Public figures can easily get lots of followers" , however, we also notice that in recent years, lots of ordinary people attract much attention by using their ways and become famous people later.
Also different people have different needs and concentrations on the Internet, I may follow my friends, not the big figures. It is a little arbitrary to measure "equal" in that way, I think for "equal", it is not an absolute concept, "too many followers" cannot mean "more equal", ordinary people on the Internet news also receive much attention. We need to develope a good measure for the "equal on the Internet".
Overall, I think on the Internet, there is not absolute "equal", people can free to express ideas, however, some sensitive issues may be prohibited.
From Daisy Lee:
Dear Alice,
Thanks so much for your reply. Your argument on how to measure "equal" is quite persuasive.
The Internet might be included in "the things that are so new we do not even understand them yet". We can see the huge development of World Wide Web in the past two decades (from BBS to blogs, then to Twitter), but who knows what's gonna happen in the next 15 or 20 years?
In 1990s IBM said in the ads that its laptops would not be obsolete "in the next five years". But now few companies dare to guarantee that their products will not be out of date in five months. Time is quite different, isn't it?
The World is "not" Flat
对“The World is "not" Flat”的回应
《世界是平的》热门书评
-
書 是 廢 話 組 成 的 -- 牛棚講書記 梁文道
549有用 37无用 麦田夜莺 2007-02-18
在我见过的评论中,这个点评是最实在的,不愧是梁兄:書 是 廢 話 組 成 的……牛棚講書記 有一 句 話 我 不 只 引 述 過 一 次 , 現 在 還 打 算 再 抄 一 次 , 因 為 它 實 在 說 出 了 真 理 。 那 就 是「 何 謂 暢 銷 書 ? 就 是 把 你...
-
美国人的21世纪生存战略
244有用 9无用 铂程斋@喷嚏网 2007-06-22
(一) 再好的东西,如果跟你无关。那么,这个东西,都只是生活的八卦,而非必需品。 这也是人们需要忽略一些东西的理由。 人生是复杂和短暂的,我们活得都忙不过来了,除了爱看热闹的天性外,我们的眼界没有超越我们生活的圈子。 我在读《世界是平的》(第二版)的时候,也是...
-
BBS补完计划
101有用 22无用 人造天堂 2008-07-02
http://bizchedan.blogbus.com/logs/47197179.html补完一词,出自经典动画片<EVA>。要讲BBS(Bulletin Board System)补完,先从网友命名为脑残的群体说起。出于书面礼貌,以下多简称NC。脑残志坚这个群体很难定义,就生活在我...
-
世界和平,还是帝国降临?
86有用 4无用 维舟 2008-09-19
不管怎么说,《世界是平的》至少是个成功的出版业营销个案。已经有无数围绕着它的书评和报道,很多人都知道了作者的主要观点:在这个坏消息接连不断的世界上,全球化将给所有愿意跟上这一潮流的人带来机会。这个面向未来的蓝图的确振奋人心,不过,关于全球化的书早已汗牛充栋,这是否仅仅是“又一本”这样的书呢?全球化的...
-
[随手一记] 世界是平的&湖南科学技术出版社&东方出版社
68有用 18无用 keepwalking 2006-09-14
[随手一记] 世界是平的&湖南科学技术出版社&东方出版社我要写书评,而且要评《世界是平的》,你信吗?熟悉我的,或熟悉我的blog的朋友,都肯定不信。但这次,各位非信不可。呃,先声明一句,这本书,我现在只看到第9页。我要评的这个版本,是很新的2006年9月版,译者是何帆、肖莹莹、郝正非...