If there's an ultimate fixed law of physics - of the whole universe, then everything is already determined by the law. If the law is the only and true, then how and where's the evolution - the mistakes and accidental incidents in nature coming from?
If the ultimate physics law is describable in math language, then it's a program, an equation, a calculus, anything math has fixed output, even a random set is calculated in predictable way with explainable results. Predictability is timeless. Math is timeless. Math is the perfect model.
Yet nature is full of imperfectness and surprises. This capability of generating genuine organic randomness and mistakes must be imbedded in the fundamental level of existence - no matter it's particle or other fundamental form. --What if there's no such a thing as fundamental? What if this deductionism mind model just another math thinking? What if one travel out of earth getting shot into space and in the deep universe after passing solar system and galaxies, what he reached as the large scale univer structure is a microscopic cell?
If the true law is change itself, then what's the pattern of change? By saying pattern, it's again an attempt looking for something fixed and predictable. If the result is nothing fixed, then could the law still be describable? In another language instead of math - the fixed timeless one, as the natural history is time-bound? If taking math language as nature language, a language could describe a scent, the mechanism of smell, yet it cannot decribe the very sensation when one smelling the scent. What if the 'fundamental law' is like the sense of a scent? Talking about scent, cyanide and almond has the same smell. In fact, we smell different smell is not because different matters has different substances, but smell is just the molecule(quantum level) vibrate in different frequencies, what we call as scent is just different form of vibrations like sound and music, it has nothing to do with what kind of attoms they are...
读后感
《时间重生》热门书评
-
试图将进化思想引入物理学
8有用 0无用 Zeitgeber 2014-01-14
“The only field which has not admitted any evolutionary question is physics. Here are the laws, we say, ... but how did they get that way, in time? .....
-
大宇宙观
1有用 0无用 freeof 2017-03-08
存在一个最基本的规律,而时间只是它的一个衍生规律,而空间只是时间的一个衍生规律,而空间中的一切自然规律只是在时间和空间基础上的众多衍生规律,并非亘古不变、创世之前已经存在。该书某种意义上颠覆了我们以往的宇宙观,为我们认知宇宙提供了一个新的方向。而我直觉认为,这个理论是已知宇宙理论中最贴近真实答案的。...
-
读后感
0有用 0无用 Pneuma 2016-05-24
If there's an ultimate fixed law of physics - of the whole universe, then everything is already determined by the law. If the law is the only and true...