I've been reading a couple of books about design this year. The law of simplicity is an excellent book that illustrates the power and underlying theory of simplicity.
Simplicity is really hard to achieve, as it is the ultimate form of complexity. Without the best understanding of the complexity of the world we are dealing with, simplicity is simply unachievable. Given we understand the complexity to some extent, reduction is the first step for achieving simplicity. Anything that does not justify its presence should be removed. However, choosing what deserves to live is at the cost of what deserves to die, which makes reduction a very hard process. When reduction of a system's functionality can be conducted with minimum penalty, that's a ideal state of simplicity. More specifically, John gives three steps to achieve that.
Shrink
If a smaller thing exceeds our expectation, we are not surprised but pleased. Trying to shrink the size of the product we are building at all measures will create higher satisfaction for the users. As lightness, thinness conveys the impression of smaller, lesser and humbler. People tend to respect things when much more value is delivered as expected.
Hide
When we have removed all we can remove. The next step is to hide the complexity that we cannot afford to remove. Shrinking an object lowers the expectation. Hide the complexity allows the user to manage the expectations themselves. Swiss army life is a good example of this, only the tool you use will expose, other blades will be hidden.
Embody
At end of the day, while making the system/object simpler by shrinking and hiding, we still want to embed the full sense of value into the product. Here basically we want to embed both the perceived as well as actual quality into the product. For example, using the best materials and exquisite craftsmanship. Ferrari is able to created the high quality value to its product in both perceived and actual form. The upside of materialism is the way something we own feels can change the way we feel.
Simplicity as a feature
《The Laws of Simplicity》热门书评
-
设计也是生活
65有用 4无用 铂程斋@喷嚏网 2007-08-18
(一) 中国人和老外的软件有些使用的细节是不同的。 就拿输入来说,连续的输入的时候,我们喜欢用回车键(Enter键)。老外一般习惯用Tab键。老外的使用意义很明确:回车代表确定。Tab键代表跳格,重新定位。 我们呢:只要用着方便,管他怎么样都行。只要能实现同样的目的,能...
-
《简单法则》读书笔记
59有用 3无用 天心 2008-09-08
思想值得一看,不过有点罗嗦,不值得花一整本书来说。所以只给三星。这本书的翻译略嫌生涩,所以在笔记里 我会以原书为本,但不通处尽量用自己的话说。其中有部分是我的评论。所谓简单法则,共计十条:一、减少 reduce 首先是取消:如果拿不定主意,就...
-
用简单滋养心灵:《简单法则》
24有用 2无用 萧秋水 2008-09-18
这本书,早该还给同事了,只是一直没空写读书笔记,所以一直羁绊手里。是本薄薄的小书,如名字一样简单,内容也简单,整本书的形式和内容,全都合乎“简单法则”。如书中所说,科技使我们的生活更为丰富,但是,如果丰富到使我们不舒服的地步,也许我们该做做减法,尽量简单一些。把复杂的事情简单化,这是一门艺术。10条...
-
拯救简单
13有用 1无用 花差花差 2007-09-10
什么理念一旦被流行看中,往往会迅速地给糟蹋掉,“简单”这个词就是这样不幸落入虎口。同样命运的还有一些作家笔下的胜境,比如梭罗的瓦尔登湖、彼得&S226;梅尔的普罗旺斯,在流行清洗过之后,它们成为了星巴克之类的切口和油淋淋的符号。但是前田约翰的《简单法则》却在流行的毒牙间拯救了简单,这件事本身...
-
十個法則
9有用 0无用 ForeverFish 2007-08-12
前田約翰在"簡單的法則"提出十個法則,可幫助我們在生活上,求取簡單與複雜的平衡,以少勝多。十個法則:1. 減少( REDUCE ) 達到簡單的最簡單方法,就是用心割捨。2. 組織( ORGANIZE ) 組織能使複雜的系統顯得比較簡單。3. 時間( TIME ) 節省時間讓人感覺...
书名: The Laws of Simplicity
作者: John Maeda
出版社: The MIT Press
副标题: Simplicity: Design, Technology, Business, Life
出版年: 2006-8-21
页数: 117
定价: USD 23.95
装帧: Hardcover
ISBN: 9780262134729